OPEN LETTER TO THE HOME AFFAIRS MINISTER, MALAYSIA Datuk
Ahmad Zahid Hamidi challenged us to show proof that Electoral Rolls are
improper hence affecting the General Elections results.
1.
Before
he would be given proofs, would he declare the General Elections 2004, General
Elections 2008 and General Elections 2013 as null and void so that all payments
to the elected representatives since 2004 be returned to the nation? Would he also do it without going to the
Courts as GE2004, and GE2008 has lapsed in the context of 21 days (to file) and
6 months to complete court process? No
other excuse please Mr. Home Affairs
Minister (HAM).
2.
Some of
those ruled illegal voters in the N13 Likas’s Election Court Case in 1999 where
the Judgement against Yong Teck Lee (the winner) was made, were still in the
Electoral Roll in GE2004. So GE2004
should be declared null and void. Do it
now Mr. HAM.
3.
The
question of Gazette is for you to declare null and void. There is a ‘stupid’ ruling that a Gazette
once published cannot be challenged especially when it is concerned the Faulty
Electoral Rolls. So any Gazette
published with wrong/inaccurate information should be considered null and void
as Gazette must only contain correct information. Election Commission declared that some 60,000
voters in Sabah Electoral Rolls were of questioned voters. So the Gazette and the Electoral Rolls now
challenged are both null and void. So Mr
HAM, please declare the GE2013 as null and void.
4.
Actually
the Gazette for GE2004 P.U. (B) 163
contained errors, hence that Gazette is null and void and 21 days and 6
months are no effect for the results of the GE2004. Mr HAM, please declare the GE2004 as null and
void. Otherwise this GE2004 can still be
challenged by the voters be it in Courts or otherwise.
5.
Mr.
HAM, actually how can EC declared many results for the Parliament and State
seats for GE 2004 and GE2008 for the winners when there are great discrepancies
in the ballot papers issued. In P028,
the said discrepancy was 4,843 when the Parliament and State seats are compared
in the ballot papers issued. Ask EC to
show you this proof and I just to mention it here.
6.
Since GE2004 and GE2008 had been challenged by
me in the High Court not as Election cases especially when frauds were
detected, there is no time limits to review such cases. I would urge Mr. HAM to consider complete
review of the cases for GE2004 and GE2008 unless you now declare them null and
void. Was justice delivered by your
court simply struck out my cases with costs?
7.
Now the
question before us is the GE2013 which is also loaded with Electoral frauds for
various ingredients aforesaid mentioned.
The Electoral Rolls for the whole nation are loaded with project IC
holders and such holders are confirmed in the RCI on illegal immigrants. So Mr
Ham, are you to declare the GE2013 null and void with or without referring to
the EC which is paid to do the ‘refereeing’ job but questioned to the bone?
8.
Finally,
if you and EC are not prepared to declared GE2013 null and void, please let the
illegitimate BN Government with a faulty appointment hand over the power to the
Pakatan Rakyat to avoid any further
inconvenience or undesirable events in the nation.
The
whole nation is quite fed up with the ongoing agitation and the rallies post
GE2013 when the majority gave their votes to PR where the Parliament seats
majority for the BN could have been manipulated through the ballot boxes. Could anyone accept that ballot boxes took
more than 6 hours to arrive at the counting centre in Kota Kinabalu from a polling
centre which is only 10 minutes away?
Was the said boxes manipulated in some ways? Did EC lodge a Police Report against the news
article in the local paper on that allegation of very late arrival of ballot
boxes? I think the ballot boxes and the
electoral process in many marginal seats were similarly ‘manipulated’ in one
way or another. I also believe that
there is a good practice that final counting could not start until all boxes
had arrived. So why such irregular
practice had occurred? There are also
allegations of sudden blackout in some centre.
EC, please tell us why Election Results cannot be declared in daylight
hours in the next day after proper checking to avoid any further electoral
disputes especially those disputed/challenged cases? The formation of the
incoming Government can also wait till next day or so.
Joshua
Y. C. Kong 25 May, 2013 013-8394513
No comments:
Post a Comment